Article for Debate: Man’s Best Friend

Items in Red are in contention, and require discussion and approval.

two wrongs don't make a rightWe, the Men, do hereby declare that no Man shall own, dog-sit, take for walkies, or otherwise bestow favor upon a member of the Canine species weighing less than 40 lbs,* nor any Canine possessing a “curly,” “puffy,” or “luxuriant” coat.**

Mandated Exceptions

  • Exception shall be made for the Married, Enfianced or otherwise formally attached Man.
  • Exception shall be made in the pursuit of forming an attachment with a suitable Lady through said Canine individual.
  • Excepted Dog Breeds:
    • Jack Russel Terrier (small yet feisty)
    • Portuguese Water Dogs (curly and puffy, but very Man appropriate water-based hunting dog)
  • *ie: capable of fitting into a Lady’s handbag
    **ie: requiring a number of beauty parlor visits to maintain the coat equal to or greater than the number of visits a Man requires to the Barber Shop***
    ***a quantity of time known to be not less than six weeks barring military service.

Spread the Manitude
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • del.icio.us
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Reddit
  • Fark
  • StumbleUpon

Tags: , ,

Friday, January 16th, 2009 1 - Floor Discussion

3 Comments to Article for Debate: Man’s Best Friend

  • I bring to the table John Steinbeck’s autobiographical work Travels with Charley clearly an exception can be made in extreme circumstances.

  • Xsuite says:

    I propose that if a dog does not fit into the aforementioned parameters, that the dog must have a redeeming awesome, manly, and/or extreme name.

    Also, Steinbeck and his dog existed long before the Articles of Men were compiled- and as per the standard set by the predominantly male American legislature, no legislature can be expected to create retroactive decrees and motions.

  • Leave a Reply

    wordpress hit counter